<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PA Sen Poll: Ridge Beats Specter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/05/06/pa-sen-poll-ridge-beats-specter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/05/06/pa-sen-poll-ridge-beats-specter/</link>
	<description>Opinion, News, Analysis, Videos and Polls.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:53:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts &#187; Ridge v. Toomey Poll Numbers</title>
		<link>http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/05/06/pa-sen-poll-ridge-beats-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts &#187; Ridge v. Toomey Poll Numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/?p=10707#comment-344</guid>
		<description>[...] RCP  addthis_url = &#039;http%3A%2F%2Fwww.poliblogger.com%2F%3Fp%3D15743&#039;; addthis_title = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RCP  addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.poliblogger.com%2F%3Fp%3D15743'; addthis_title = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of Northeast Republicans Greatly Exaggerated &#171; Gop3.com: The Triumvirate</title>
		<link>http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/05/06/pa-sen-poll-ridge-beats-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of Northeast Republicans Greatly Exaggerated &#171; Gop3.com: The Triumvirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/?p=10707#comment-337</guid>
		<description>[...] Pennsylvania Senate: Specter (D)(I), 41 - Ridge (R), 48 New Jersey Governor: Corzine (D)(I), 36 - Christie (R), 47 New York Governor: Paterson (D)(I), 32 - Guiliani (R), 53 Connecticut Senate: Dodd (D)(I), 42 - Simmons (R), 43 Delaware Senate: Biden (D), 34 - Castle (R), 55 New Hampshire Senate: Hodes (D), 41 - Sununu (R), 46 Connecticut Governor: Bysiewicz (D), 32 - Rell (R)(I), 53 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pennsylvania Senate: Specter (D)(I), 41 - Ridge (R), 48 New Jersey Governor: Corzine (D)(I), 36 - Christie (R), 47 New York Governor: Paterson (D)(I), 32 - Guiliani (R), 53 Connecticut Senate: Dodd (D)(I), 42 - Simmons (R), 43 Delaware Senate: Biden (D), 34 - Castle (R), 55 New Hampshire Senate: Hodes (D), 41 - Sununu (R), 46 Connecticut Governor: Bysiewicz (D), 32 - Rell (R)(I), 53 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Principles vs. electability &#171; The Tiger in DC</title>
		<link>http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/05/06/pa-sen-poll-ridge-beats-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Principles vs. electability &#171; The Tiger in DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/?p=10707#comment-336</guid>
		<description>[...] vs.&#160;electability    Polls show that Ridge beats Spector by seven, while Spector beats Toomey by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vs.&nbsp;electability    Polls show that Ridge beats Spector by seven, while Spector beats Toomey by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I LOVE Hearing That</title>
		<link>http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/05/06/pa-sen-poll-ridge-beats-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I LOVE Hearing That</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/?p=10707#comment-335</guid>
		<description>[...] looks as though Specter will have a serious primary opponent. While polling shows Specter is likely to win that matchup, it means he will (i) face the risk of losing, (ii) have to raise and spend money for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looks as though Specter will have a serious primary opponent. While polling shows Specter is likely to win that matchup, it means he will (i) face the risk of losing, (ii) have to raise and spend money for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let Freedom Ring &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I LOVE Hearing That</title>
		<link>http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/05/06/pa-sen-poll-ridge-beats-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Let Freedom Ring &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I LOVE Hearing That</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/?p=10707#comment-333</guid>
		<description>[...] looks as though Specter will have a serious primary opponent. While polling shows Specter is likely to win that matchup, it means he will (i) face the risk of losing, (ii) have to raise and spend money for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looks as though Specter will have a serious primary opponent. While polling shows Specter is likely to win that matchup, it means he will (i) face the risk of losing, (ii) have to raise and spend money for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crossed Pond &#187; You Know What Would Be Hilarious?</title>
		<link>http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/05/06/pa-sen-poll-ridge-beats-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crossed Pond &#187; You Know What Would Be Hilarious?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/?p=10707#comment-330</guid>
		<description>[...] one point egging Specter into defecting must have seemed a pretty low risk high reward move. Now, not so much.   posted in: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one point egging Specter into defecting must have seemed a pretty low risk high reward move. Now, not so much.   posted in: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
